NOT KNOWN FACTS ABOUT BAIL CASE LAW ON SEC 337 A II PPC

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Blog Article

These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, although the transaction occurred just before its promulgation. Read more

A decrease court may not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it can be unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it could possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents from the boy or Woman never approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they can do if they could cut off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners could search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

With the foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically cause exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not encourage the department of his/her more info innocence.

However it is made crystal clear that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also guarantee regard on the family shed in accordance with regulation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Looking at the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be obtained. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated over. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Only the written opinions from the Supreme Court as well as the Court of Appeals are routinely out there. Decisions of your reduced (trial) courts are usually not generally published or dispersed.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, aiding you in understanding the intricacies of land and property legislation.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender plus the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

ten. Based about the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't regarded as maintainable and is particularly therefore liable being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more

8. To the reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition to become without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend in the comments, and their request is Therefore acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are founded by executive organizations based on statutes.

Report this page